Memes Article
THE STUDY OF MEMES (a new field called "memetics") is going
revolutionize psychology, cultural anthropology, political
science and religious studies. In fact it has already started.
Memetics will have as dramatic an impact on those fields as the
discovery of the gene had on biology.
The word "meme" was coined by the British
zoologist, Richard Dawkins in his book The Selfish Gene which
came out in 1976. Dawkins' book was a presentation of a new way
of looking at genes. Up until then, the conventional way of
understanding genes was from the organism's point of view. In
other words, genes are selected that help the organism survive.
The problem with that way of looking at it was several facts
did not seem to fit. Dawkins said when you think of it from the
individual gene's point of view, all those facts fit.
He went further to say that whenever you have something that
can make copies of itself, like DNA, you will have evolution
because some copies will survive better or reproduce faster,
and those will eventually outcompete the other kinds.
And in his last chapter, he said genes aren't the only things
in this universe that make copies of themselves. There is one
other thing that we know of, but there isn't a word for it, so
Dawkins made one up: memes. A meme is anything that can be
copied from one mind to another.
A song is a meme. A saying is a meme. An idea is a meme. The
custom of shaking hands is a meme. The word "meme" is itself a
meme and it has now been copied from my mind to yours.
Dawkins further said that because memes get copied, they will
evolve. Some will copy better than others. Some will be more
"contagious" than others. And if they are not all be copied
perfectly, any given variation has the potential to be more
contagious than the original, in which case it will survive
better or be copied more often, so that meme will eventually
dominate.
So for example, if you have a religion and it's going along
just fine and somewhere along the way, someone adds the idea
that if you can convert others to your religion, you are more
likely to get into heaven, then you now have a new variation, a
mutation in the collection of memes that comprise the religion.
Now you have two versions of the same religion. One branch,
say, keeps the religion to themselves. In the other branch,
many of the followers are out actively trying to recruit new
converts. Give those two branches a couple hundred years, and
guess which one will have more converts? It doesn't matter
whether it is right or wrong. It is blind, just as natural
selection of genes is blind. If a variation allows a gene or a
meme to make more copies, it makes more copies.
This is a very interesting subject, and since Dawkins' book
came out, several other books have been written on the subject.
The best one is called The Meme Machine. Also one with some
great examples is called Thought Contagion. A new one, The
Electric Meme, was written to establish the scientific
legitimacy of the field. It is good but highly technical.
Does "meme" stand for culture?
Yes, a meme could be seen as a unit of culture. What the
concept of meme adds is the idea of evolution, of competition
between variations of a meme, and the idea that it is possible
to look at a meme from the meme's perspective rather than from
the organism's perspective. In other words, memes are making
copies of themselves, using our brains and biology to do it,
and what will succeed may have nothing to do with what helps
the organism or even the group. For example, if you have a tune
in your head you can't get rid of, what is going on? It is a
successful meme using your brain against your will to generate
copies of itself. In this case, you might not be making a
sound, so all it is doing is going around in your head, but as
soon as you whistle it or hum it, it is now using you to put
copies of itself into the brains of others.
A new theory often doesn't add any new facts, but explains the
facts with more power, or more completely, and opens new
avenues to explore that weren't available with previous
theories. A good new theory also makes testable predictions
possible that weren't possible before. A new theory is better
if it has more explanatory power, and the memetics theory
does.
One of the ways I think memetics will impact psychology
is...hell, I think it will completely change psychology. Think
about what the field of biology was before the theory of
evolution. Hardly recognizable. Yes, they studied life forms.
But now the foundation of biology rests on the solid footing of
Darwinism. Everything biological is based on it. I think that
will happen to psychology with the theory of memetics. What is
the role, for example, of early learning? How is it influenced?
Is our brain pre-wired to make copies of memes? Are there
biological predispositions toward learning some kinds of memes
but not others? Can learning curriculums be designed to use
this meme-copying machinery better than previous
curriculums?
People have "learned" a lot of things that aren't true, and may
even be harmful. Could you have something like gene therapy
(where they infect you with a virus that corrects your own
DNA), called meme-therapy, where they can correct important
faulty or dysfunctional memes by infecting you with a meme
virus?
It's a new science. It'll be interesting to see it
mature.
Author: Adam Khan
Self Help Stuff That Works
For more information on Memes:
Meme Central
|